Psychological criticism used towards the story The Strange Case of Dr Term Paper

Psychological criticism used towards the explanation The Strange Case of Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde - Term Paper ExampleIn her book Routledge Critical Thinkers Sigmund Freud, Pamela Thurschwell dwells more deeply on the conception of the human psyche, that is, Freuds iceberg metaphor. She explains the struggle between the Id, Ego and Superego in the quest manner a. Id Basic needs - it is all about me. Not reality found. b. Ego Reality based or alters reality to justify his actions. c. Superego Social programming - what is acceptable for the character - morality and conscience. (81-83) This particular arrange of fiction by St eventideson is most commonly associated with the rare mental condition often referred to as break personality disorder, where there exist two distinct personalities within the same person. This effect is also attached to the so called doppelganger motif, which represents a tangible double of a living person that typically represents fell, a notion which pred ates Freuds concept of the repressed, unconscious alter ego. The doppelganger represents the narrators attempt to project an inner flagitious into the outside world, which is exactly the case with Jekyll. This idea has been widely used in literature, ranging from authors and works like Oscar Wildes The Picture of Dorian Gray, Edgar Allan Poes William Wilson, Fyodor Dostoyevskys The Double and many others, whose protagonists find their identical nemesis in a psychological self-splitting process. This notion centers on the conception of humanity as dual in nature, even though the readers become fully aware of this in the last chapter, when the true story of Jekyll and Hyde emerges before them. Until the real end of the novella, these two characters seem nothing alike, and one post by no means exonerate the connection between the well liked, respectable doctor Jekyll and the indescribably hideous and disfigured appearance of Hyde He is not easy to describe. There is something wrong withhis appearance something displeasing, something downright detestable. I never saw a man I so disliked, and yet I scarce know why. He must be deformed somewhere he gives a strong feeling of deformity, although I couldnt specify the point. Hes an extraordinary-looking man, and yet I really can name nothing out of the way. No, sir I can make no hand of it I cant describe him. And its not fatality of memory for I declare I can see him this moment. (Stevenson 12) When Enfield relates to Utterson how he watched Hyde trample a circumstantial girl underfoot. Utterson asks his friend to describe Hydes appearance, but Enfield, as the quote indicates, proves unable to formulate a clear portrait.This lack of eloquence does not mean that he did not see him clearly. Quite the contrary, the two-bagger of Hyde is branded into his mind as he speaks, yet he fails to articulate Hydes ugliness and deformity. This creates the consequence of Hyde as being almost intangible, mysterious, beyond wo rds, just as he is beyond morality and conscience. Viewed as an almost supernatural creation, he is not of this world, and correspondingly, he manages to evade the comprehensive faculties of human beings. He represents the evil